Build
Humans and agents, working together.
Responsibility for a piece of work gets split rather than transferred. Accounts receivable stays with the Finance Manager; the agent owns first reminders and payment status checks, and the human owns arrangements, disputes and write-offs. That split is written down, and it is the honest version of what this technology does.
One responsibility, split
Accounts receivable · owned by the Finance Manager
The agent’s half
- First reminders
- Payment status checks
- Follow-up tasks
- Escalating exceptions
The human’s half
- Payment arrangements
- Disputes
- Write-offs
- The relationship
Splitting the work does not split the accountability. The agent owns tasks; the Finance Manager owns accounts receivable.
The split is recorded, not assumed
Which parts of a responsibility the agent holds and which stay human, written on the responsibility itself. "The agent does the chasing" is not specific enough to rely on.
A person still owns the whole thing
The agent owns tasks. The Finance Manager owns accounts receivable. Splitting the work does not split the accountability, and an agent is never the owner of an outcome.
The boring half is the agent's half
Agents get the repetitive, high-volume, low-judgement work. Humans keep the parts that need discretion, relationship or a decision somebody can be held to.
Not a headcount argument
This product does not model staff reductions and will not produce a figure implying them. What it shows is which work happened without a person, which is a different claim.
Questions this answers
The things you currently have to ask somebody.
Each of these is a question an owner asks regularly and currently answers from memory, a spreadsheet, or by interrupting whoever is nearest.
Which parts of this responsibility does the agent hold?
Who is accountable if the agent gets it wrong?
What should stay with a person, and why?
How much of this responsibility currently runs without anybody?
Where this stops
What it does not do.
The platform records a split in responsibility; it cannot enforce one in your organisation. If the Finance Manager stops reading the escalations, the arrangement fails and no configuration prevents that. It also holds no view on what work should be a person's — the boundaries a customer sets are theirs, and the defaults here are conservative rather than correct.
Next
Where this connects.
Give AI a job.
Build an agent, choose what it can access, define what it may do, and deploy it to work safely across your business.
No code required · Full SDKs and API · Stop any agent instantly · [email protected]